How to Critique a Review Paper

Whether you are a peer or even a teacher, critiquing a review paper is usually an important duty regarding you and an important rite in the author’s advancement as a writer. It could be an honor in addition to a privilege; but is actually not ceremonial, it’s serious. As critic, you’re in order to pick apart the review paper and outline problems areas, explaining how these people could be better offered. Not only are you to critique the writer’s grammar, syntax and type — concepts with set up rules — you must look at the writer’s work from various facets of the big picture, a task fraught with couleur and subjectivity.

Go through Critically

Examine the strength of typically the paper by reviewing regardless of whether the writer’s information will be concise and consistent, and whether it includes important analysis data. The information presented need to also be in appropriate sequence. Also, determine whether the writer’s ideas segue smoothly into the summary.

Look to find out if the particular information provided by the writer is relevant in order to the subject he’s critiquing. The writer’s findings should be coherent and properly blended. The information presented from the writer should describe this issue without causing typically the reader to draw upwards too many questions.

Verify if the conclusion consolidates the data provided in the particular body of the review paper. The conclusion should not introduce new info or results but need to provide an ending in order to the topic discussion.

Examine the paper for contradictory statements or contradictory elements. Create notations to the article writer so he can review, clarify or revise.

Double-check any data, evidence or examples provided by the creator to make sure the particular information doesn’t contain defects in interpretation. Also, decide if the data, proof or examples support the final outcome or idea. Make certain the evidence provided comes from credible and reliable sources. Ask yourself in case you may understand how the particular evidence relates to the conclusion.

Determine whether enough information is presented to accurately arrive at the final outcome.

Help to make sure the review moves well and presents typically the author’s reasoning in a new clear manner.

Look for ambiguous phrases and phrases and think about how they could be clarified.

Supplying Criticism in a Constructive Manner

Explain your understanding from the overview paper by using terms such as “From what I understand, the primary focus in this area is… ” This method the author won’t take your current opinion as an assault or misinterpret the point you’re making, or consider you’re a know-it-all.

Inquire mcdougal to clarify any areas you don’t understand. You can ask questions such as, “What is the purpose of this section? ” or even “Why is this instance important? ”

Point out areas that seem not related or unnecessary to the particular topic, why some paragraphs don’t fit into typically the paper and if any kind of information provided isn’t reinforced. Instead of just expressing something is “wrong, inches explain why it is usually and give types of techniques to correct it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *